Supporting Use-Case Reviews
نویسندگان
چکیده
Use cases are a popular way of specifying functional requirements of computer-based systems. Each use case contains a sequence of steps which are described with a natural language. Use cases, as any other description of functional requirements, must go through a review process to check their quality. The problem is that such reviews are time consuming. Moreover, effectiveness of a review depends on quality of the submitted document if a document contains many easy-to-detect defects, then reviewers tend to find those simple defects and they feel exempted from working hard to detect difficult defects. To solve the problem it is proposed to augment a requirements management tool with a detector that would find easy-to-detect defects automatically.
منابع مشابه
Editor’s Note
Iranian Rehabilitation Journal is the only English journal in Rehabilitation and research in Middle East. Number fourteen of this journal is going to be published with variety of articles in rehabilitation issues. We welcome original articles, reviews and case reports. Open Access Journal is a journal that uses a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. DOAJ...
متن کاملSome Notes on Critical Appraisal of Prevalence Studies; Comment on: “The Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews Addressing Questions of Prevalence”
Decisions in healthcare should be based on information obtained according to the principles of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM). An increasing number of systematic reviews are published which summarize the results of prevalence studies. Interpretation of the results of these reviews should be accompanied by an appraisal of the methodological quality of the included data and studies. The critical a...
متن کاملBroadening public participation in systematic reviews: a case example involving young people in two configurative reviews
BACKGROUND Arguments supporting the involvement of users in research have even more weight when involving the public in systematic reviews of research. We aimed to explore the potential for public involvement in systematic reviews of observational and qualitative studies. METHODS Two consultative workshops were carried out with a group of young people (YP) aged 12-17 years to examine two ongo...
متن کاملThe Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews: Addressing Questions of Prevalence
Background Recently there has been a significant increase in the number of systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Key features of a systematic review include the creation of an a priori protocol, clear inclusion criteria, a structured and systematic search process, critical appraisal of studies, and a formal process of data extraction followed by methods to synthesize, or combin...
متن کاملIdentify the dimensions and components of governance formation to implement the law of organizing and supporting the production and supply of housing
One of the main concerns of developing countries is to achieve good governance, and in the meantime, the implementation of the law on organizing and supporting the production and supply of housing is of great importance. Therefore, this study has been conducted with the aim of identifying the dimensions and components of governance formation to implement the law of organizing and supporting t...
متن کامل